____
The work that I am going to present, comes more from the theoretical reflections of that kind of historical research. Although history and historiography have been for me what was for Virgil "POET" in Comedy.I will use a way of prologue the beautiful words of Joachim: "It is not a chore just that these days ahead. But those who will be suitable for these tasks? In fact, perhaps the one who could refuse, and one who would not be able; who owns the elegance of speech, lack the science, to those who are given knowledge, he has denied saying appropriately. So, therefore, no one would be suitable. But perhaps all this must be justified in the same way? He who knows not, though not to neglect or negligence, has an excuse, or at all trustworthy, or at least plausible; The one who is allowed to know, even if he imparts, he has none or almost none. But perhaps, since I say these things, I attach one of two possibilities, so that I would presume to arrogate the merit of science? Absolutely no. Rather I, that I recognize myself in the one totally inadequate, the other I fear very judgment. Because, although I can not believe you are wise, if not stupidity, but I could not apologize to ignore what I am required to say, if not for falsehood. I will speak, then, as I can, otherwise I will indicate with the signs. And if I can not imitate men, I imitate the animal without intelligence, or else the man without word, which goes by signs stating what he saw. ". (Gioacchino da Fiore, Sull’Apocalisse, tr. it. e a c. di Andrea Tagliapietra, Feltrinelli, Milano 1994) What you want to talk about is the dream of utopias, ranging from Plato to Campanella and beyond, in other words, the attempt to create a better world and the world dell0'armonia peace. In most of the texts on the "State" written by philosophers and scientists, there are two factors that could be called fixed. These two factors are: 1 ° the presence of a leader or a group of enlightened men 2nd entire population that has got to evolve and self-governing democratically choosing their leaders. What do they show us these two factors? The first is a kind of civilization that still needs a guide to evolve; the second is already advanced civilization, or who no longer have need of guides, but of representatives. However, both the first and the second factor is something common, namely the achievement of a goal, that according to information we have, and little known, leading or the boss or the entire population to an evolution. This evolution is the awareness of something. Our goal right now is to andere to verify what is happening and makes present and operative this realization.
To address this survey we distaccheremo from classic track to get into the theoretical. What allows a subject or set of subjects to rise and want a world or almost antithetical to that in quele lived before? The answers may be multiple, but we interessauna in particular. From our point of view only the knowledge and then philosophical knowledge in the strict sense, can allow the subject to get to conceive of a world other than that of oppression. Before you go Next and should pause for a moment on what it means to philosophical knowledge or at least the meaning we attach to the term philosophy in this area. We speak here of philosophy and philosophical knowledge in the strict sense is equivalent to diri love to Sofia and love for Sofia is the path that brings the subject to be simply a researcher something to be a man reborn after death. What does rebirth? The revival to which we are referring is the rebirth after all who die within themselves, who sacrifice their conscience to make sure that once freed from unnecessary heart overweight the person is reborn man. In this state of things the man purificatosi the atrocities that until then had accompagnatodeve take note of something else. In him it grew Jered (The Christ that is born and develops within us). At this point we have a man who in addition to having reached the philosophical knowledge, develops within themselves what is called in Hebrew Jered, but that in our Renaissance a Dominican called Heroic Fury. The comparison may seem audacious and forced, but in fact conceptually the two are similar. That is, both the one and the other concept push man towards the Brotherhood, the equal sign and the freedom of thought (with all that implies) and push it to the defense of their ideals to the extreme sacrifice, death of the meat.In summary, we can say that we have identified in the philosophical knowledge the reason or probable cause for perfection by man. But the man who has perfected through the study and application of philosophy and who therefore knows things that others do not know, how to act towards other people?Before answering this question it is necessary to open a parenthesis. Metuschelah (consciousness must die in itself to bear fruit in the material world in order to produce the abundance and harmony in the land of men) and Jered are not two terms-concept to be read separately, but rather united. In other words: the first has no possibility of realization without the second. If only for the deep symbiosis that unites them. These two concepts are closely linked and us through the philosophy and Jered we get to Metuschelah. In fact this is the point of arrival, that state or situation where being all free you can start the "work" for the building of temples and of the men closest to harmony than they are today. Men who have the right component of Salt, Sulfur and Mercury, as the alchemists believed Renaissance.Returning to our main speech, it is time to answer the question on the behavior of individuals who know against those who do not know.The answer is more than obvious based on the argument made, the first spontaneous feel the need to pass on their knowledge and help each other because the harmony and prosperity can only be achieved with the Brotherhood.Wanting to insist in the sense of explanation regarding the concept of brotherhood will call into question two fundamental concepts: that of GNOSIS and to KNOWLEDGE. Speaking of diagnosis we must try to understand a meaning in the sense exactly airtight. Just as one may suppose, the diagnosis is a cognitive process assulotamente linked to spiritual maturity and mental (from Psyche = Soul = Breath) of the individual who pushed from their inner balance, which is then assumed, the new essence to the full knowledge of Because of the creative forces and to the knowledge of the facts of their externalization. It is, therefore, of a real "planetary motion" of his being voted the "conquest" of what is most sublime and accessible.
But the exercise of gnosis is a point of arrival, and I myself have yet to know who can be so exalted and presumptuous claim to be Illuminated.Gnosis, therefore, assumes as its attribute to individuality, and the rebirth of man is the rebirth of the individual.How bride gnosis with knowledge?My provocation tends just to clarify this relationship. If knowledge is to know together (from Co - gnosco), it assumes a fact of consciousness. But consciousness is "truth" made a purely individual. If knowledge is a report and a meeting of two or more minds, this means that the growth of collective or group around the same content supposes an internalization individual of the same content; every experience is the prerequisite of a microcosm of the individual, which can not be ignored the importance of internalizing within itself.Let's face then: if those who are on the road of gnosis is on the road to rebirth, in extending its expertise to the individual as the group has to deal with every lived, with all consciousness, with each microcosm. But as these attributes of individuality, we will have a conflict between what the general authority and what is particular. And 'here that intervenes the concept of freedom of the individual. And 'here it comes the esoteric content, which focuses on enhancing the discovery and conquest of gnosis by each. But this does not mean that it is a reality to put in salt. Quite the contrary: It 'with the disclosure that is balanced and controlled by the opportunity to those who can draw on a well of otherwise invisible. If we are talking of freedom, then it is permissible to speak of "freedom of opportunity", that values the concept of rebirth; It is linked to the concept of the possibility of rinacsita.
Fight for freedom means, therefore, to fight for the chance to become MEN.
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento